Identification of Key Components of Smart Customer Relationship Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis Approach

Authors

    Foroozan Sharififar Department of Business Management, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
    Manouchehr Niknam * Department of Business Management, Marketing Branch, Faculty of Management, Ghazali Higher Education Institute,Qazvin, Iran. Info@ghazali.ac.ir
    Mehdi Zakipour Department of Business Management, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

Keywords:

exploitation, exploration, Marketing ambidexterity maturity, organizational innovation, telecommunications industry

Abstract

The objective of this study was to design and explain a marketing ambidexterity maturity model emphasizing the balance between exploratory and exploitative marketing activities in Iran’s telecommunications industry. This applied study employed a qualitative approach using grounded theory based on the Strauss and Corbin paradigm. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 experts, including telecommunications managers, marketing specialists, technology professionals, and academic scholars. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. Qualitative data were analyzed using MAXQDA software through open, axial, and selective coding procedures. Trustworthiness was ensured using credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability criteria. The final paradigm model clarified relationships among causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening factors, strategies, and outcomes shaping marketing ambidexterity maturity. The findings indicated that marketing ambidexterity maturity emerges through causal conditions including market innovation demands, availability of technological infrastructures, and pressures arising from dynamic technological environments. The phenomenon develops within contextual conditions such as organizational structure, human and cultural resources, and market characteristics, while being moderated by intervening factors including governmental policies, economic resources, leadership style, and industry competition. Strategic responses comprised technological capability development, institutionalization of ambidexterity culture, strategic restructuring, human resource empowerment, and external collaboration. These strategies resulted in improved marketing performance, market expansion, sustainable competitive advantage, and enhanced organizational learning and innovation, ultimately leading to a sustainable balance between exploration and exploitation. The study demonstrates that marketing ambidexterity maturity represents a strategic and cultural transformation in telecommunications organizations whereby institutionalized ambidextrous thinking, data-driven decision-making, and continuous capability development enable firms to simultaneously leverage existing competencies and explore future opportunities, ensuring long-term competitiveness in technology-intensive environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardabili, F. S., Verbenko, G., & Cajnko, P. (2025). The effects of organizational agility on organizational performance: the mediating role of ambidexterity. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability Risus, 16(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i2p114-123

Blondiau, A., Mettler, T., & Winter, R. (2016). Designing and implementing maturity models in hospitals: An experience report from 5 years of research. Health Informatics Journal, 22(3), 758-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215590249

Chebbi, H., Yahiaoui, D., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2015). Building multiunit ambidextrous organizations-a transformative framework. Human Resource Management, 54, 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21662

Hakimi, I., & Gholami Avati, R. (2023). Innovation ambidexterity: Antecedents and its effects on new product development. Executive Management Research Journal, 15(29), 45-61. https://jem.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_4301.html?lang=en

Ho, H., Osiyevsky, O., Agarwal, J., & Reza, S. (2020). Does ambidexterity in marketing pay off? The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 110, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.050

Ho, H. D., & Lu, R. (2015). Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.004

Hosseini Fooladi, S., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Ajami, S. (2009). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational maturity of employees in hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2007-2008. Research in Curriculum Planning (Knowledge & Research in Educational Sciences - Curriculum Planning), 6(23-21), 101-116. https://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-107-en.html

Josephson, W., Johnson, L., & Mariadoss, J. (2016). Strategic marketing ambidexterity: Antecedents and financial consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0438-5

Khodami, S., Sadegh Vaziri, F., & Henari, A. (2025). Investigating the effect of ambidextrous factors on international marketing agility. Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, 16(61), 47-70. https://www.smsjournal.ir/article_216100_en.html

Mehrabi, H., Coviello, N., & Ranaweera, C. (2019). Ambidextrous marketing capabilities and performance: How and when entrepreneurial orientation makes a difference. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.014

Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., & Arteaga, F. (2014). Driving organisational ambidexterity through process management. The key role of cultural change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 1026-1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.776768

Nazara, D. S. (2025). Marketing Strategy Innovation: Enhancing Competitiveness and Differentiation of Local Products in the Global Market. Oikonomia: Journal of Management Economics and Accounting, 2(3), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.61942/oikonomia.v2i3.358

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025

Santos-Neto, J. B. S., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2019). Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(5), 719-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1575986

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x

Srikanth, K., & Ungureanu, T. (2025). Organizational adaptation in dynamic environments: Disentangling the effects of how much to explore versus where to explore. Strategic management journal, 46(1), 19-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3646

Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Submitted

2025-03-26

Revised

2025-06-22

Accepted

2025-06-29

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Sharififar, F. ., Niknam, M., & Zakipour, M. . (1404). Identification of Key Components of Smart Customer Relationship Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis Approach. Management, Education and Development in Digital Age, 1-14. https://www.jmedda.com/jmedda/article/view/267

Similar Articles

1-10 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.